|
| 
enlarge | Brand: Canon Category: Photography
List Price: $320.00 Buy New: $184.95 You Save: $135.05 (42%)
New (34) Used (1) Refurbished (1)
Avg. Customer Rating: 131 reviews
Media: Electronics Autographed: No Memorabilia: No Fragile: No Batteries Included: No Optical Zoom: 4 Maximum Focal Length: 300 Minimum Focal Length: 75 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.1 Dimensions (in): 6.9 x 4.5 x 4.2 Warranty: 1 year warranty
MPN: C219892 Model: 6472A002 UPC: 082966214080 EAN: 0082966214080 ASIN: B00004THCZ
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Customer Reviews:
1st timer August 13, 2008 For a very reasonable price you get pretty good quality. not bad for a novice like me.I suppose if I was a pro this would not be good enough but the lens is as good as this user is and I have enjoyed the pictures I have taken with it.
Canon EF 75-300 III USM July 30, 2008 2 out of 2 found this review helpful
I was between this lens and the IS (image stabilization) model. For the price I tried this model, as I have gone this far, about 40 years, with out IS. I am very pleased with the overall quality. In full sun I have hand held it at about 250mm, with great results. Otherwise I'll use a tripod. No big deal. I use the lens on a Rebel XTi and find the balance to be very pleasing. Shooting wild life in lower light conditions, it would be nice to have another f stop, but now you are talking a lot more money.
Canon EF 75-300 lens July 10, 2008 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Great lens. Very smooth manual focus and zoom, and autofcous is seemless. Well worth the money.
It is what you pay for. June 22, 2008 1 out of 2 found this review helpful
If you are looking for a lens with this sort of focal length, it is going to be your cheapest option. It focuses slow. Really really slow. I have the 5D with the 24-105L, and it is almost painful to switch between the two. If you are trying to shoot a kids soccer game in broad daylight this will suit you fine. If you are taking pictures of your dog on a Sunday afternoon. This is not a focal length I use a lot, so it suits me fine. If you are serious about sport or wild life photography, you aren't going to buy this anyway. I would suggest saving your pennies and buying the 70-200 f/4L for just over $500. Kinda wish I had done that, but I had already dropped enough on the 5D.
Not really a very good lens June 10, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This lens is inexpensive, and it shows in terms of poor image quality, among other things. Unless you simply cannot afford something better, I would stay away from this one. I had it for a very short period of time before I got rid of it. Then again, at the price it is being offered, one cannot have too much grounds for complaint.
|
|
|
Disclaimer: This is an Amazon storefront - the products referenced on this site are manufactured and sold by other parties and sold through Amazon.com We make no representations regarding either the products or any information vendors offer about their products. Any questions, complaints, or claims regarding the products must be directed to the appropriate manufacturer or vendor, or to Amazon.com. |
| |